تزامن الفحص الجيني للأجنة قبل الزرع (PGS) + فحص قابلية بطانة الرحم لزرع الجنين (ERA)

Sanchez-Ribas et al., Transcriptomic behavior of genes associated with chromo some 21 aneuploidies in early embryo development. Fertility and Sterility, 2019; 111, 5:991-1001. 

Goldwaser, Tamar et al. Cell-free DNA for the detection of fetal aneuploidy. Fertility and Sterility, 2018; 109, 2, 195 – 200. 

Kuznyetsov V, Madjunkova S, Antes R, Abramov R, Motamedi G, Ibarrientos Z, et al.  Evaluation of a novel non-invasive preimplantation genetic screening approach. PLoS ONE; 2018; 13(5): e0197262. 

Munné S, Status of preimplantation genetic testing and embryo selection. RBMO. 2018; 37(4):393-396. 

Levy et al., Prenatal diagnosis by chromosomal microarray analysis. Fertility and Sterility, 2017; 109, 2, 201–212.  

Ottolini C. et al., Scientific Reports. Tripolar mitosis and partitioning of the genome arrests human preimplantation development in vitro, 2017;7:9744. 

Ottolini C. et al., Scientific Reports. Tripolar mitosis and partitioning of the genome arrests human preimplantation development in vitro, 2017;7:9744. 

Munné, Santiago et al. Mosaicism: “survival of the fittest” versus “no embryo left behind”. Fertility and Sterility, 2016; 105, 5, 1146 – 1149. 

Bolton et al., Mouse model of chromosome mosaicism reveals lineage-specific depletion of aneuploid cells and normal developmental potential. Nature Communications, 2016; 29;7:11165. 

Cimadomo D. et al, The Impact of Biopsy on Human Embryo Developmental Potential during Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis. Hindawi, 2016, 7193075. 

Scott RT, Galliano D., The challenge of embryonic mosaicism in preimplantation genetic screening. Fertility and Sterility, 2016; 105, 5. 

McCoy RC, Demko ZP, Ryan A, Banjevic M, Hill M, Sigurjonsson S, et al.  Evidence of Selection against Complex Mitotic-Origin Aneuploidy during Preimplantation Development. PLoS Genet, 2015; 11 (10): e1005601.  

Kung A. et al., Validation of next-generation sequencing for comprehensive chromosome screening of embryos. Reproductive BioMedicine, 2015; 1472-6483. 

Greco E, Minasi MG, Fiorentino F. Healthy Babies after Intrauterine Transfer of Mosaic Aneuploid Blastocysts, N Engl J Med, 2015; Nov 19;373(21):2089-90.  

Yang Z et al., Selection of single blastocysts for fresh transfer via standard morphology assessment alone and with array CGH for good prognosis IVF patients: results from a randomized pilot study., 2012, 5:24. 

The role of the endometrial receptivity array (ERA) in patients who have failed euploid embryo transfers. Tan J, Kan A, Hitkari J, Taylor B, Tallon N, Warraich G, Yuzpe A, Nakhuda G. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018 Jan 11. doi: 10.1007/s10815-017-1112-2. [Epub ahead of print] 

Combinatorial use of Endometrial Receptivity Array (ERA) and PGT-A can improve the clinical outcome in cases with previous ART failures. N. Findikli, M. Gultomruk, K. Boynukalin, M. Kavrut, E. Oral, M. Bahceci. ESHRE Oral communication. 

Pregnancy outcomes in patients undergoing embryo transfer in cycle following endometrial receptivity assay. M. Pasternak, G. Schattman, Z. Rosenwaks. ASRM Poster.  

The implantation rate of Japanese infertile patients with repeated implantation failure can be improved by endometrial receptivity array (ERA) test: A randomized controlled trial.  S. Taguchi, M. Funabiki, T. Hayashi, Y. Tada, Y. Iwaki, M. Karita, T. Ota, K. Maeda, T. Matsubara, P. Zada, N. Sugiyama, Y. Nakamura. ASRM Oral communication. 

Efficacy of the endometrial receptivity array for repeated implantation failure in Japan: A retrospective, two-centers study. Hashimoto T, Koizumi M, Doshida M, Toya M, Sagara E, Oka N, Nakajo Y, Aono N, Igarashi H, Kyono K. Reprod Med Biol. 2017 Jun 27;16(3):290-296. doi: 10.1002/rmb2.12041. eCollection 2017 Jul. PMID:29259480 

Assessment of endometrial receptivity by endometrial receptivity array (ERA) in patients with adenomyosis and previous implantation failure in IVF.  Kaur S, Mahajan N, Rani K, Naidu P, Kaur J. ESHRE Poster. 

Mode of progesterone administration and its effects on endometrial receptivity in programmed frozen embryo transfer cycles.  Rosen A, Huang A, Billb Y. PCRS Poster.  

Endometrial Receptivity and pregnancy rates are higher after 7 days of progesterone in medicated FET cycles.  A.M. Propst, L. Hansard, K. Silverberg, M. Hegtvedt, N.Z. Burger, T.C. Vaughn. ASRM Poster. 

Endometrial receptivity array: Clinical application. Mahajan N. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2015 Jul-Sep;8(3):121-9. doi: 10.4103/0974-1208.165153. Review. PMID:26538853. 

Live birth after embryo transfer in an unresponsive thin endometrium.  F. Cruz, J. Bellver. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2014 Jul;30(7):481-4. doi: 10.3109/09513590.2014.900747. Epub 2014 Mar 20. 

Mode of progesterone administration and its effects on endometrial receptivity in programmed frozen embryo transfer cycles.  Rosen A, Huang A, Billb Y. PCRS Poster.